posted on 19/11/2020 10:35Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci.
"In 1987 the West London Synagogue approached Islington Council with a startling proposal: to sell its original cemetery to property developers, destroying the gravestones and digging-up and reburying the bodies lying under them. This cemetery 7(dating from 1840) was not merely of great historic and architectural interest – in the view of orthodox Jews, the deliberate destruction of a cemetery is sacrilegious.
"7So when Islington Council granted the planning application, a Jewish-led and ultimately successful campaign was launched to have the decision reversed.
"I was part of that campaign. So was Jeremy Corbyn.
"Meanwhile, the then-leader of Islington Council (1982-92)7, whose decision to permit the destruction of the cemetery was eventually overturned, was none other than
"Margaret Hodge"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
"7So when Islington Council granted the planning application, a Jewish-led and ultimately successful campaign was launched to have the decision reversed.
"I was part of that campaign. So was Jeremy Corbyn.
"Meanwhile, the then-leader of Islington Council (1982-92)7, whose decision to permit the destruction of the cemetery was eventually overturned, was none other than
"Margaret Hodge"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21691 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17528 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18296 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18610 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18296 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19107 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19331 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19203 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19408 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19523 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19570 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19938 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19927 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20204 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19998 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20113 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20249 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20145 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20136 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19930 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19927 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19993 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20136 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20145 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20249 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20113 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19998 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20204 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19927 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19938 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19570 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19523 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19408 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19780 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19398 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18623 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18340 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17640 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18340 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18623 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19398 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19203 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17528 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.