posted on 19/11/2020 10:35Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci.
"In 1987 the West London Synagogue approached Islington Council with a startling proposal: to sell its original cemetery to property developers, destroying the gravestones and digging-up and reburying the bodies lying under them. This cemetery 7(dating from 1840) was not merely of great historic and architectural interest – in the view of orthodox Jews, the deliberate destruction of a cemetery is sacrilegious.
"7So when Islington Council granted the planning application, a Jewish-led and ultimately successful campaign was launched to have the decision reversed.
"I was part of that campaign. So was Jeremy Corbyn.
"Meanwhile, the then-leader of Islington Council (1982-92)7, whose decision to permit the destruction of the cemetery was eventually overturned, was none other than
"Margaret Hodge"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
"7So when Islington Council granted the planning application, a Jewish-led and ultimately successful campaign was launched to have the decision reversed.
"I was part of that campaign. So was Jeremy Corbyn.
"Meanwhile, the then-leader of Islington Council (1982-92)7, whose decision to permit the destruction of the cemetery was eventually overturned, was none other than
"Margaret Hodge"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 19233 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15459 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16065 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 16312 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16065 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 16889 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 17056 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17131 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17278 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17386 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17437 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17745 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17768 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 17975 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17865 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 17938 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18073 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 17932 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 17949 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 17807 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 17746 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 17753 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 17949 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 17932 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18073 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 17938 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17865 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 17975 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17768 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17745 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17437 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17386 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17278 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 17651 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17211 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16611 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16335 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 15631 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16335 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16611 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17211 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17131 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15459 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.