posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26637 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21290 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22163 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22480 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22163 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 23060 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23296 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23103 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23727 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23369 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23551 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24331 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23831 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24512 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23929 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24475 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24217 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24479 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24069 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23917 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24255 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23866 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24069 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24479 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24217 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24475 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23929 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24512 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23831 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24331 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23551 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23369 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23727 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24165 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23308 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22919 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22243 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21865 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22243 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22919 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23308 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23103 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21290 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


