posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25259 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20215 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21024 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21353 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21024 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21846 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22066 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21949 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22502 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22226 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22357 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23064 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22648 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23300 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22732 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23259 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22998 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23251 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22894 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22706 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23078 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22739 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22894 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23251 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22998 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23259 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22732 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23300 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22648 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23064 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22357 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22226 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22502 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22928 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22148 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21718 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21078 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20698 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21078 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21718 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22148 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21949 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20215 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


