posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26500 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21214 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22076 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22404 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22076 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22985 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23202 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23032 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23646 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23291 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23470 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24227 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23755 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24422 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23834 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24373 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24123 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24395 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23974 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23847 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24170 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23775 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23974 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24395 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24123 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24373 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23834 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24422 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23755 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24227 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23470 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23291 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23646 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24067 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23221 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22838 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22176 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21796 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22176 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22838 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23221 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23032 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21214 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


