home about dictionary mobile mode

Click to enlarge

Posts: 172188

Messaging Enabled

Back to the board Previous Post Reply

posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae

(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)

- A Farewell to Kings -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 19321 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15550 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16179 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 16450 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 16993 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 17164 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17211 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17369 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17468 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17512 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17833 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17848 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 18073 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17948 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18026 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18163 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18026 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 18039 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 17877 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 17824 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 17848 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 17726 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17314 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16705 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16453 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 15728 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.