posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 31598 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 25349 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 26245 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 26691 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 26245 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 27241 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 27489 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 27428 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 28090 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 27728 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 27920 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 28760 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 28081 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 28789 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 28255 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 28745 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 28647 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 28745 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 28337 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 28486 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 28496 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 27967 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 28337 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 28745 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 28647 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 28745 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 28255 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 28789 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 28081 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 28760 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 27920 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 27728 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 28090 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 28439 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 27542 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 27087 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 26382 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 25986 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 26382 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 27087 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 27542 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 27428 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 25349 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


