posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23653 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19083 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19900 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20213 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19900 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20753 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20968 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20834 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21239 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21161 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21250 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21797 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21574 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22044 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21659 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21998 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21923 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21983 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21802 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21546 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21790 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21633 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21802 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21983 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21923 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21998 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21659 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22044 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21574 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21797 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21250 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21161 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21239 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21608 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21040 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20443 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19954 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19386 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19954 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20443 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21040 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20834 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19083 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.