posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 27591 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22052 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22947 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23269 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22947 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 23876 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24062 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23907 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24505 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24158 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24343 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25105 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24557 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25257 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24684 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25220 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25010 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25234 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24835 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 24745 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24997 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 24594 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24835 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25234 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25010 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25220 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24684 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25257 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24557 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25105 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24343 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24158 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24505 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24937 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24088 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23666 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23012 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 22611 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23012 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23666 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24088 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23907 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22052 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


