posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24815 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19921 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20725 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21059 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20725 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21556 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21780 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21647 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22233 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21939 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22055 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22795 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22369 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23034 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22452 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22984 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22713 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22975 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22585 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22369 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22811 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22459 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22585 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22975 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22713 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22984 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22452 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23034 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22369 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22795 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22055 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21939 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22233 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22642 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21863 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21453 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20786 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20396 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20786 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21453 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21863 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21647 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19921 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


