posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23191 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18629 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19443 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19754 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19443 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20300 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20496 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20387 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20777 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20726 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20812 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21343 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21129 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21588 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21229 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21542 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21481 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21530 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21359 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21095 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21304 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21179 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21359 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21530 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21481 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21542 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21229 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21588 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21129 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21343 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20812 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20726 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20777 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21154 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20561 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19961 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19488 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18951 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19488 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19961 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20561 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20387 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18629 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.