posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23217 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18660 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19472 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19787 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19472 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20334 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20543 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20423 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20812 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20763 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20845 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21380 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21172 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21625 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21261 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21582 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21528 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21574 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21408 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21134 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21341 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21213 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21408 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21574 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21528 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21582 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21261 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21625 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21172 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21380 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20845 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20763 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20812 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21195 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20607 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19996 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19522 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18991 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19522 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19996 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20607 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20423 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18660 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.