posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 30417 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 24231 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 25161 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 25541 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 25161 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 26104 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 26324 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 26230 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26833 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 26487 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26649 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 27473 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26884 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27560 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 27012 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27499 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 27385 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 27481 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 27088 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 27164 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 27242 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 26763 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 27088 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 27481 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 27385 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27499 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 27012 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27560 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26884 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 27473 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26649 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 26487 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26833 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 27195 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 26313 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25878 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 25232 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 24830 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 25232 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25878 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 26313 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 26230 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 24231 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


