posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 29812 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23692 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24614 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24977 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24614 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 25566 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 25777 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25696 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26275 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25936 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26102 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26926 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26370 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27046 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26504 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26987 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26852 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26971 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26583 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 26646 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 26723 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 26276 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26583 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26971 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26852 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26987 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26504 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27046 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26370 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26926 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26102 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25936 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26275 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 26661 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25792 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25365 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24724 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 24291 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24724 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25365 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25792 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25696 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23692 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


