posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26044 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20752 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21611 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21920 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21611 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22465 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22693 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22532 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23102 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22793 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22944 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23662 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23203 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23867 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23310 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23835 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23586 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23815 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23448 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23286 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23612 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23254 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23448 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23815 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23586 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23835 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23310 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23867 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23203 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23662 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22944 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22793 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23102 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23539 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22716 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22303 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21651 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21281 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21651 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22303 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22716 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22532 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20752 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


