posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21936 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17682 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18459 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18755 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18459 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19278 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19506 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19382 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19579 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19695 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19743 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20136 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20107 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20392 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20192 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20312 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20446 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20338 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20334 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20084 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20118 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20166 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20334 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20338 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20446 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20312 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20192 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20392 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20107 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20136 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19743 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19695 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19579 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19952 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19563 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18774 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18488 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17807 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18488 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18774 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19563 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19382 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17682 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.