posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23211 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18652 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19462 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19777 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19462 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20327 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20533 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20415 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20803 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20753 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20832 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21363 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21157 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21611 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21248 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21569 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21513 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21558 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21397 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21121 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21329 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21203 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21397 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21558 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21513 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21569 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21248 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21611 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21157 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21363 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20832 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20753 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20803 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21186 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20599 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19989 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19516 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18982 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19516 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19989 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20599 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20415 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18652 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.