Posts: 8872
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26629 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21290 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22160 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22478 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22160 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 23058 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23294 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23102 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23726 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23369 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23545 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24329 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23829 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24512 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23929 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24475 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24215 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24476 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24068 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23916 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24253 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23865 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24068 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24476 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24215 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24475 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23929 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24512 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23829 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24329 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23545 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23369 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23726 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24165 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23304 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22916 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22241 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21862 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22241 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22916 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23304 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23102 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21290 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.