Posts: 8838
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25145 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20147 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20967 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21290 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20967 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21797 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22020 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21889 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22447 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22181 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22307 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23031 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22589 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23253 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22667 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23216 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22947 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23195 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22843 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22636 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23035 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22695 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22843 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23195 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22947 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23216 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22667 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23253 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22589 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23031 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22307 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22181 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22447 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22875 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22100 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21669 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21017 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20636 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21017 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21669 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22100 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21889 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20147 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.