Posts: 8826
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24031 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19382 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20208 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20524 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20208 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21043 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21270 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21134 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21539 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21442 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21534 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22119 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21859 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22358 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21935 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22325 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22198 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22306 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22093 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21839 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22112 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21933 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22093 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22306 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22198 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22325 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21935 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22358 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21859 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22119 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21534 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21442 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21539 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21937 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21341 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20764 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20256 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19727 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20256 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20764 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21341 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21134 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19382 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.