Posts: 8796
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 19256 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15480 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16088 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 16339 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16088 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 16922 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 17089 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17165 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17321 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17431 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17481 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17790 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17807 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 18015 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17898 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 17969 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18108 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 17965 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 17975 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 17833 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 17779 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 17782 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 17975 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 17965 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18108 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 17969 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17898 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 18015 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17807 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17790 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17481 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17431 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17321 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 17677 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17234 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16637 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16359 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 15658 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16359 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16637 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17234 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17165 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15480 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.