Posts: 8796
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 19252 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15475 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16083 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 16333 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16083 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 16918 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 17086 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17162 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17318 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17428 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17479 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17786 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17807 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 18013 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17894 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 17966 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18106 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 17963 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 17973 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 17832 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 17777 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 17780 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 17973 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 17963 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18106 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 17966 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17894 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 18013 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17807 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17786 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17479 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17428 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17318 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 17675 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17231 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16634 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16358 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 15658 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16358 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16634 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17231 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17162 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15475 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.