Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 19254 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15477 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16085 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 16337 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16085 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 16920 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 17089 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17165 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17320 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17430 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17481 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17787 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17807 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 18015 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17896 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 17968 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18107 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 17964 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 17975 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 17833 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 17778 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 17781 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 17975 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 17964 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18107 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 17968 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17896 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 18015 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17807 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17787 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17481 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17430 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17320 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 17677 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17233 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16637 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16358 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 15658 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16358 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16637 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17233 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17165 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15477 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.