Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 19293 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15529 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16164 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 16430 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16164 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 16980 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 17150 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17205 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17359 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17463 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17507 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17822 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17836 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 18053 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17943 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18021 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18157 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18019 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 18034 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 17869 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 17809 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 17821 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 18034 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18019 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18157 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18021 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17943 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 18053 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17836 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17822 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17507 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17463 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17359 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 17702 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17291 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16685 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16421 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 15705 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16421 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16685 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17291 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17205 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15529 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.