Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 19230 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15457 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16062 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 16310 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16062 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 16886 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 17054 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17130 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17276 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17386 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17436 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17743 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17765 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 17973 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17863 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 17935 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18070 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 17929 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 17946 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 17804 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 17742 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 17748 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 17946 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 17929 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18070 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 17935 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17863 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 17973 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17765 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17743 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17436 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17386 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17276 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 17646 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17207 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16609 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16333 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 15629 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16333 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16609 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17207 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17130 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15457 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.