posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae

well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26345 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21048 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21906 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22225 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21906 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22782 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23012 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22839 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23442 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23100 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23255 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24010 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23517 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24187 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23629 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24170 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23913 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24139 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23768 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23631 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23944 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23580 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23768 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24139 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23913 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24170 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23629 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24187 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23517 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24010 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23255 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23100 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23442 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23874 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23030 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22630 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21981 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21612 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21981 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22630 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23030 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22839 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21048 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


