posted on 19/11/2020 13:13any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman
Thought not, only outraged when it suits
- Tundumcaseum! -
- Tundumcaseum! -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 19236 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15461 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16067 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 16318 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16067 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 16896 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 17061 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17136 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17282 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17389 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17444 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17752 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17778 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 17987 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17875 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 17949 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18084 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 17942 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 17957 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 17811 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 17754 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 17763 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 17957 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 17942 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18084 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 17949 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17875 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 17987 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17778 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17752 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17444 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17389 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17282 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 17657 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17216 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16615 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16341 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 15634 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16341 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16615 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17216 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17136 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15461 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.