posted on 19/11/2020 13:13any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman
Thought not, only outraged when it suits
- Tundumcaseum! -
- Tundumcaseum! -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23726 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19152 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19969 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20268 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19969 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20802 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21025 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20895 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21288 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21205 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21291 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21845 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21621 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22099 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21718 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22046 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21971 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22044 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21854 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21604 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21845 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21685 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21854 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22044 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21971 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22046 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21718 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22099 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21621 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21845 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21291 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21205 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21288 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21671 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21091 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20496 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20010 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19447 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20010 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20496 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21091 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20895 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19152 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.