posted on 19/11/2020 13:13any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman
Thought not, only outraged when it suits
- Tundumcaseum! -
- Tundumcaseum! -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26476 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21195 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22047 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22385 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22047 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22963 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23186 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23015 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23623 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23269 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23446 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24208 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23747 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24401 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23820 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24356 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24101 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24366 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23953 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23831 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24144 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23762 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23953 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24366 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24101 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24356 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23820 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24401 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23747 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24208 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23446 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23269 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23623 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24052 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23205 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22819 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22153 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21775 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22153 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22819 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23205 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23015 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21195 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


