posted on 19/11/2020 13:13any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman
Thought not, only outraged when it suits
- Tundumcaseum! -
- Tundumcaseum! -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26442 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21140 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22002 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22346 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22002 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22914 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23130 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22941 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23562 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23206 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23371 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24127 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23649 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24321 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23748 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24290 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24033 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24287 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23878 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23763 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24082 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23706 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23878 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24287 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24033 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24290 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23748 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24321 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23649 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24127 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23371 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23206 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23562 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23996 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23151 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22761 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22099 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21716 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22099 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22761 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23151 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22941 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21140 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


