home about dictionary mobile mode

Click to enlarge

Posts: 8796

Back to the board Previous Post Next Post Reply

posted on 19/11/2020 12:00So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci.

i.e. "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 19259 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15487 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16094 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 16344 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 16929 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 17100 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17173 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17324 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17434 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17483 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17792 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17811 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 18023 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17903 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 17973 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18111 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 17970 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 17979 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 17837 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 17781 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 17787 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 17683 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17242 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16644 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16364 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 15659 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.