Posts: 8796
posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.
Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 19245 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15468 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16076 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 16322 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16076 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 16901 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 17069 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17147 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17298 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17406 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17458 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17765 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17793 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 18001 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17889 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 17961 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18095 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 17953 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 17970 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 17822 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 17767 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 17769 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 17970 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 17953 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18095 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 17961 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17889 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 18001 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17793 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17765 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17458 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17406 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17298 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 17664 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17227 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16626 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16351 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 15644 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16351 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16626 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17227 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17147 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15468 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.