Posts: 8796
posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.
Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 19263 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15496 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16110 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 16363 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16110 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 16944 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 17112 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17182 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17328 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17442 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17489 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17795 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17822 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 18032 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17906 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 17986 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18122 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 17977 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 17990 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 17839 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 17783 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 17795 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 17990 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 17977 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18122 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 17986 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17906 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 18032 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17822 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17795 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17489 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17442 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17328 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 17687 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17253 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16654 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16373 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 15673 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16373 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16654 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17253 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17182 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15496 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.