Posts: 8796
posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.
Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 19230 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15458 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16062 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 16310 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16062 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 16886 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 17054 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17130 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17276 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17386 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17437 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17745 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17767 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 17973 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17863 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 17935 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18070 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 17930 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 17948 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 17806 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 17744 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 17749 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 17948 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 17930 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18070 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 17935 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17863 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 17973 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17767 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17745 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17437 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17386 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17276 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 17646 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17208 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16609 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16333 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 15630 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16333 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16609 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17208 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17130 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15458 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.