home about dictionary mobile mode

Click to enlarge

Posts: 8796

Back to the board Previous Post Next Post Reply

posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.

Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.

I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 19248 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15469 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16081 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 16326 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 16903 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 17074 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17156 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17308 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17411 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17466 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17777 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17800 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 18007 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17891 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 17963 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18101 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 17959 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 17972 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 17824 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 17772 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 17774 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 17664 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17229 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16629 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16355 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 15650 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.