Posts: 175729
posted on 19/11/2020 10:30go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae
I can only imagine what and where it goes
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26035 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20737 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21589 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21897 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21589 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22451 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22682 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22516 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23080 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22772 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22925 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23643 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23187 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23843 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23295 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23822 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23567 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23794 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23431 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23261 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23592 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23241 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23431 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23794 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23567 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23822 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23295 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23843 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23187 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23643 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22925 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22772 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23080 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23527 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22696 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22288 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21638 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21262 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21638 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22288 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22696 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22516 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20737 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.