Posts: 178210
posted on 19/11/2020 10:30go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae
I can only imagine what and where it goes
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 31735 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 25492 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 26397 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 26831 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 26397 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 27384 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 27621 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 27578 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 28237 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 27881 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 28080 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 28932 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 28227 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 28955 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 28408 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 28900 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 28808 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 28914 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 28506 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 28643 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 28656 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 28106 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 28506 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 28914 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 28808 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 28900 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 28408 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 28955 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 28227 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 28932 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 28080 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 27881 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 28237 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 28597 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 27688 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 27228 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 26514 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 26130 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 26514 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 27228 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 27688 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 27578 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 25492 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.