home about dictionary mobile mode

Click to enlarge

Posts: 8850

Back to the board Previous Post Next Post Reply

posted on 19/11/2020 10:11do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci.

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25857 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20617 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21472 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21766 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22273 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22504 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22396 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22967 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22668 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22826 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23557 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23083 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23751 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23191 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23728 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23460 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23691 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23315 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23132 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23482 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23128 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23373 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22590 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22178 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21509 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21137 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.