2020 10:10Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

I take it you don't agree with what it says

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 19244 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15468 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16073 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 16320 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 16901 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 17065 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17141 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17294 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17404 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17454 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17761 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17787 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 17995 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17887 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 17961 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18091 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 17950 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 17969 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 17820 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 17764 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 17768 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 17664 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17225 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16622 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16348 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 15640 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

posted on 19/11/2020 10:10Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Report Abuse

Post Your Reply