posted on 18/11/2020 18:03Re: It has and it was - Nicolae
So you'd disagree with one Viber saying it's just "some made up anti semitism crap" and another claiming "You and I know full well it was ******" then?
doesn't seem that certain Labour supporters are taking in the reality of the report's findings
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 19310 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15548 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16177 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 16444 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16177 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 16987 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 17160 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17209 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17366 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17468 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17511 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17829 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17841 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 18065 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17945 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18024 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18160 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18020 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 18035 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 17875 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 17821 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 17837 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 18035 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18020 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18160 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18024 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17945 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 18065 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17841 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17829 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17511 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17468 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17366 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 17720 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17306 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16696 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16436 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 15713 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16436 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16696 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17306 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17209 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15548 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.