posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26706 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21322 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22195 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22526 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22195 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 23120 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23354 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23149 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23769 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23408 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23597 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24378 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23875 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24553 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23978 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24520 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24268 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24523 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24104 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23957 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24297 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23919 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24104 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24523 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24268 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24520 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23978 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24553 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23875 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24378 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23597 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23408 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23769 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24210 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23371 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22977 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22312 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21915 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22312 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22977 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23371 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23149 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21322 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

