posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26315 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21026 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21881 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22198 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21881 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22756 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22975 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22818 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23405 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23069 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23229 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23972 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23487 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24153 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23595 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24135 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23881 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24111 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23733 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23602 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23915 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23546 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23733 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24111 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23881 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24135 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23595 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24153 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23487 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23972 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23229 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23069 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23405 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23844 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22992 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22600 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21952 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21587 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21952 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22600 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22992 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22818 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21026 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

