posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26421 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21129 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21991 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22332 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21991 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22900 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23123 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22931 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23552 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23194 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23359 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24118 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23632 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24302 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23730 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24281 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24017 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24260 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23861 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23737 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24057 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23685 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23861 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24260 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24017 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24281 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23730 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24302 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23632 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24118 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23359 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23194 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23552 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23978 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23129 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22744 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22079 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21699 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22079 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22744 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23129 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22931 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21129 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

