posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 30500 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 24301 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 25224 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 25620 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 25224 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 26188 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 26417 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 26288 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26925 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 26558 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26729 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 27562 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26954 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27649 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 27083 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27574 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 27463 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 27568 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 27168 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 27232 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 27333 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 26852 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 27168 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 27568 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 27463 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27574 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 27083 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27649 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26954 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 27562 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26729 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 26558 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26925 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 27295 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 26412 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25964 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 25318 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 24899 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 25318 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25964 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 26412 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 26288 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 24301 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

