posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26244 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20946 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21803 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22124 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21803 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22681 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22899 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22729 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23332 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22994 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23153 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23891 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23414 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24075 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23520 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24053 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23802 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24032 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23661 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23530 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23834 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23470 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23661 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24032 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23802 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24053 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23520 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24075 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23414 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23891 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23153 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22994 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23332 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23760 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22922 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22521 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21874 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21510 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21874 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22521 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22922 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22729 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20946 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


