posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26333 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21042 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21896 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22216 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21896 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22779 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22998 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22835 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23432 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23091 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23247 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24002 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23509 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24178 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23616 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24163 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23901 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24135 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23760 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23622 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23936 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23570 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23760 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24135 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23901 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24163 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23616 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24178 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23509 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24002 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23247 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23091 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23432 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23868 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23017 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22623 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21970 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21607 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21970 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22623 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23017 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22835 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21042 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


