home about dictionary mobile mode

Click to enlarge

Posts: 172178

Messaging Enabled

Back to the board Previous Post Next Post Reply

posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae

Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.

a few of which appear to be vibers

- A Farewell to Kings -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 19295 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15531 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16165 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 16434 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 16981 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 17150 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17205 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17359 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17463 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17508 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17825 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17836 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 18057 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17943 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18021 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18157 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18019 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 18034 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 17870 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 17810 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 17821 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 17704 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17294 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16688 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16424 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 15705 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.