posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae
well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23223 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18677 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19495 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19804 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19495 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20350 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20563 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20447 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20828 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20783 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20858 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21387 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21191 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21639 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21269 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21599 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21535 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21586 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21423 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21148 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21358 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21234 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21423 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21586 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21535 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21599 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21269 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21639 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21191 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21387 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20858 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20783 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20828 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21209 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20630 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20014 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19545 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19009 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19545 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20014 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20630 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20447 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18677 times)