posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae

well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26475 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21194 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22047 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22385 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22047 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22963 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23185 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23014 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23622 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23269 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23445 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24207 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23746 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24401 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23819 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24354 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24100 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24365 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23952 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23831 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24144 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23761 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23952 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24365 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24100 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24354 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23819 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24401 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23746 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24207 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23445 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23269 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23622 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24052 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23205 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22818 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22151 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21774 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22151 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22818 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23205 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23014 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21194 times)


