2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae

"Having to resort to 'legal defiitions' to excuse their (possible) behaviour or speech ....etc"

We both know where this whole 'thing' is going, we saw it with Kinnock in the 80s , we saw it with Blair in the 90s / 00s and we're seeing it again now with Starmer in the 20s. As Arty so very well put it yesterday "I'm worried we (Labour) will remain in a civil war"

Plus ca change

- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23792 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19216 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20028 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20330 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20852 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21063 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20952 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21334 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21255 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21348 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21912 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21672 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22143 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21763 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22112 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22027 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22096 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21912 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21657 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21892 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21717 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21713 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21131 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20548 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20058 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19501 times)

posted on 19/11/2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae

Report Abuse