2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae

"Having to resort to 'legal defiitions' to excuse their (possible) behaviour or speech ....etc"

We both know where this whole 'thing' is going, we saw it with Kinnock in the 80s , we saw it with Blair in the 90s / 00s and we're seeing it again now with Starmer in the 20s. As Arty so very well put it yesterday "I'm worried we (Labour) will remain in a civil war"

Plus ca change

- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 30400 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 24225 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 25146 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 25532 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 26096 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 26309 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 26213 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26820 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 26471 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26639 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 27462 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26875 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27547 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 27002 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27483 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 27371 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 27473 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 27082 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 27155 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 27235 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 26752 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 27181 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 26304 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25869 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 25221 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 24817 times)

posted on 19/11/2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae

Report Abuse