2020 11:59Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae

It does seems strange (to an outsider) that, as their power is slipping away, the hard left are now calling for party unity, but didn't seem so keen on it when they were in control.

Having to resort to 'legal defiitions' to excuse their (possible) behaviour or speech doesn't smack much of unity either. Nor do comments like it's just "some made up anti semitism crap" or "You and I know full well it was ******", that appear to be completely dismissing the report's findings.

It does look (again to an outsider) that there is a (large?) section of Corbynistas that think there was, and is, no problems to address.

- A Farewell to Kings -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 19243 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 15464 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 16070 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 16320 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 16901 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 17064 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 17141 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 17287 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 17394 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 17451 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 17756 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 17782 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 17992 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 17883 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 17956 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 18088 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 17949 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 17963 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 17817 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 17762 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 17766 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 17663 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 17221 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 16619 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 16345 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 15637 times)

posted on 19/11/2020 11:59Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae

Report Abuse