Posts: 6467
posted on 25/6/2020 08:36Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue
We can all pick extreme examples of something so as to justify a wider point. I'd equally say to you that rock climbing and mountain biking can be dangerous so should we ban those? The answer, to both your example and mine, for most reasonable people is obvious.
The wider point however is important. To what extent should governments dictate to the individual how they behave. My view, since you ask, is that the starting point in every case should be that there is no state compulsion and instead a reliance on the individual to make sensible choices of their own.
The wider point however is important. To what extent should governments dictate to the individual how they behave. My view, since you ask, is that the starting point in every case should be that there is no state compulsion and instead a reliance on the individual to make sensible choices of their own.
- "Labour is ideologically at ease with the state control that the emergency has ushered in." - bitterblue 24/6 21:40 (read 15056 times, 16 posts in thread)
- What does "state control of the individual" mean? - Gramsci. 24/6 22:57 (read 15374 times)
- in the context of the article - bitterblue 25/6 07:28 (read 15311 times)
- And your view? The restrictions that we were under in April and May - Gramsci. 25/6 08:09 (read 15751 times)
- Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue 25/6 08:36 (read 15442 times)
- I am assuming that the Telegraph article you mentioned at the start is topical/about lockdown etc - Gramsci. 25/6 09:03 (read 15827 times)
- The reference I made to extreme examples - bitterblue 25/6 09:18 (read 15862 times)
- Which aspects of the lockdown were too severe for you? Nt - Gramsci. 25/6 10:09 (read 15927 times)
- Quelle surprise! - bitterblue 25/6 10:47 (read 15661 times)
- I thought we were comparing our appetite for libertarianism. So - Gramsci. 25/6 11:29 (read 15824 times)
- You misunderstand my initial post, - bitterblue 25/6 12:54 (read 15609 times)
- would it be unfair to say... - Nicolae 25/6 14:00 (read 15897 times)
- I don't think you're right there - Gramsci. 25/6 14:25 (read 15772 times)
- (hasty title edit) your post makes sense now ;-) - Nicolae 25/6 14:55 (read 15610 times)
- I don't think you're right there - Gramsci. 25/6 14:25 (read 15772 times)
- "a higher rather than lower level of governmental control over the individual citizen" = the libertarian continuum - Gramsci. 25/6 13:56 (read 15311 times)
- <tumbleweed> from bitterblue - Gramsci. 26/6 19:07 (read 14549 times)
- would it be unfair to say... - Nicolae 25/6 14:00 (read 15897 times)
- You misunderstand my initial post, - bitterblue 25/6 12:54 (read 15609 times)
- I thought we were comparing our appetite for libertarianism. So - Gramsci. 25/6 11:29 (read 15824 times)
- Quelle surprise! - bitterblue 25/6 10:47 (read 15661 times)
- Which aspects of the lockdown were too severe for you? Nt - Gramsci. 25/6 10:09 (read 15927 times)
- The reference I made to extreme examples - bitterblue 25/6 09:18 (read 15862 times)
- I am assuming that the Telegraph article you mentioned at the start is topical/about lockdown etc - Gramsci. 25/6 09:03 (read 15827 times)
- Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue 25/6 08:36 (read 15442 times)
- And your view? The restrictions that we were under in April and May - Gramsci. 25/6 08:09 (read 15751 times)
- in the context of the article - bitterblue 25/6 07:28 (read 15311 times)
- What does "state control of the individual" mean? - Gramsci. 24/6 22:57 (read 15374 times)