Posts: 6607
posted on 25/6/2020 08:36Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue
We can all pick extreme examples of something so as to justify a wider point. I'd equally say to you that rock climbing and mountain biking can be dangerous so should we ban those? The answer, to both your example and mine, for most reasonable people is obvious.
The wider point however is important. To what extent should governments dictate to the individual how they behave. My view, since you ask, is that the starting point in every case should be that there is no state compulsion and instead a reliance on the individual to make sensible choices of their own.
The wider point however is important. To what extent should governments dictate to the individual how they behave. My view, since you ask, is that the starting point in every case should be that there is no state compulsion and instead a reliance on the individual to make sensible choices of their own.
- "Labour is ideologically at ease with the state control that the emergency has ushered in." - bitterblue 24/6 21:40 (read 18476 times, 16 posts in thread)
- What does "state control of the individual" mean? - Gramsci. 24/6 22:57 (read 18943 times)
- in the context of the article - bitterblue 25/6 07:28 (read 18847 times)
- And your view? The restrictions that we were under in April and May - Gramsci. 25/6 08:09 (read 19322 times)
- Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue 25/6 08:36 (read 18994 times)
- I am assuming that the Telegraph article you mentioned at the start is topical/about lockdown etc - Gramsci. 25/6 09:03 (read 19480 times)
- The reference I made to extreme examples - bitterblue 25/6 09:18 (read 19458 times)
- Which aspects of the lockdown were too severe for you? Nt - Gramsci. 25/6 10:09 (read 19561 times)
- Quelle surprise! - bitterblue 25/6 10:47 (read 19234 times)
- I thought we were comparing our appetite for libertarianism. So - Gramsci. 25/6 11:29 (read 19479 times)
- You misunderstand my initial post, - bitterblue 25/6 12:54 (read 19182 times)
- would it be unfair to say... - Nicolae 25/6 14:00 (read 19748 times)
- I don't think you're right there - Gramsci. 25/6 14:25 (read 19463 times)
- (hasty title edit) your post makes sense now ;-) - Nicolae 25/6 14:55 (read 19429 times)
- I don't think you're right there - Gramsci. 25/6 14:25 (read 19463 times)
- "a higher rather than lower level of governmental control over the individual citizen" = the libertarian continuum - Gramsci. 25/6 13:56 (read 18887 times)
- <tumbleweed> from bitterblue - Gramsci. 26/6 19:07 (read 18098 times)
- would it be unfair to say... - Nicolae 25/6 14:00 (read 19748 times)
- You misunderstand my initial post, - bitterblue 25/6 12:54 (read 19182 times)
- I thought we were comparing our appetite for libertarianism. So - Gramsci. 25/6 11:29 (read 19479 times)
- Quelle surprise! - bitterblue 25/6 10:47 (read 19234 times)
- Which aspects of the lockdown were too severe for you? Nt - Gramsci. 25/6 10:09 (read 19561 times)
- The reference I made to extreme examples - bitterblue 25/6 09:18 (read 19458 times)
- I am assuming that the Telegraph article you mentioned at the start is topical/about lockdown etc - Gramsci. 25/6 09:03 (read 19480 times)
- Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue 25/6 08:36 (read 18994 times)
- And your view? The restrictions that we were under in April and May - Gramsci. 25/6 08:09 (read 19322 times)
- in the context of the article - bitterblue 25/6 07:28 (read 18847 times)
- What does "state control of the individual" mean? - Gramsci. 24/6 22:57 (read 18943 times)
