Posts: 6366
posted on 25/6/2020 08:36Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue
We can all pick extreme examples of something so as to justify a wider point. I'd equally say to you that rock climbing and mountain biking can be dangerous so should we ban those? The answer, to both your example and mine, for most reasonable people is obvious.
The wider point however is important. To what extent should governments dictate to the individual how they behave. My view, since you ask, is that the starting point in every case should be that there is no state compulsion and instead a reliance on the individual to make sensible choices of their own.
The wider point however is important. To what extent should governments dictate to the individual how they behave. My view, since you ask, is that the starting point in every case should be that there is no state compulsion and instead a reliance on the individual to make sensible choices of their own.
- "Labour is ideologically at ease with the state control that the emergency has ushered in." - bitterblue 24/6 21:40 (read 12542 times, 16 posts in thread)
- What does "state control of the individual" mean? - Gramsci. 24/6 22:57 (read 12762 times)
- in the context of the article - bitterblue 25/6 07:28 (read 12719 times)
- And your view? The restrictions that we were under in April and May - Gramsci. 25/6 08:09 (read 13066 times)
- Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue 25/6 08:36 (read 12788 times)
- I am assuming that the Telegraph article you mentioned at the start is topical/about lockdown etc - Gramsci. 25/6 09:03 (read 13157 times)
- The reference I made to extreme examples - bitterblue 25/6 09:18 (read 13089 times)
- Which aspects of the lockdown were too severe for you? Nt - Gramsci. 25/6 10:09 (read 13250 times)
- Quelle surprise! - bitterblue 25/6 10:47 (read 12969 times)
- I thought we were comparing our appetite for libertarianism. So - Gramsci. 25/6 11:29 (read 13142 times)
- You misunderstand my initial post, - bitterblue 25/6 12:54 (read 12925 times)
- would it be unfair to say... - Nicolae 25/6 14:00 (read 13131 times)
- I don't think you're right there - Gramsci. 25/6 14:25 (read 13127 times)
- (hasty title edit) your post makes sense now ;-) - Nicolae 25/6 14:55 (read 12849 times)
- I don't think you're right there - Gramsci. 25/6 14:25 (read 13127 times)
- "a higher rather than lower level of governmental control over the individual citizen" = the libertarian continuum - Gramsci. 25/6 13:56 (read 12675 times)
- <tumbleweed> from bitterblue - Gramsci. 26/6 19:07 (read 12073 times)
- would it be unfair to say... - Nicolae 25/6 14:00 (read 13131 times)
- You misunderstand my initial post, - bitterblue 25/6 12:54 (read 12925 times)
- I thought we were comparing our appetite for libertarianism. So - Gramsci. 25/6 11:29 (read 13142 times)
- Quelle surprise! - bitterblue 25/6 10:47 (read 12969 times)
- Which aspects of the lockdown were too severe for you? Nt - Gramsci. 25/6 10:09 (read 13250 times)
- The reference I made to extreme examples - bitterblue 25/6 09:18 (read 13089 times)
- I am assuming that the Telegraph article you mentioned at the start is topical/about lockdown etc - Gramsci. 25/6 09:03 (read 13157 times)
- Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue 25/6 08:36 (read 12788 times)
- And your view? The restrictions that we were under in April and May - Gramsci. 25/6 08:09 (read 13066 times)
- in the context of the article - bitterblue 25/6 07:28 (read 12719 times)
- What does "state control of the individual" mean? - Gramsci. 24/6 22:57 (read 12762 times)