Posts: 6365
posted on 25/6/2020 08:36Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue
We can all pick extreme examples of something so as to justify a wider point. I'd equally say to you that rock climbing and mountain biking can be dangerous so should we ban those? The answer, to both your example and mine, for most reasonable people is obvious.
The wider point however is important. To what extent should governments dictate to the individual how they behave. My view, since you ask, is that the starting point in every case should be that there is no state compulsion and instead a reliance on the individual to make sensible choices of their own.
The wider point however is important. To what extent should governments dictate to the individual how they behave. My view, since you ask, is that the starting point in every case should be that there is no state compulsion and instead a reliance on the individual to make sensible choices of their own.
- "Labour is ideologically at ease with the state control that the emergency has ushered in." - bitterblue 24/6 21:40 (read 12516 times, 16 posts in thread)
- What does "state control of the individual" mean? - Gramsci. 24/6 22:57 (read 12714 times)
- in the context of the article - bitterblue 25/6 07:28 (read 12654 times)
- And your view? The restrictions that we were under in April and May - Gramsci. 25/6 08:09 (read 12968 times)
- Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue 25/6 08:36 (read 12709 times)
- I am assuming that the Telegraph article you mentioned at the start is topical/about lockdown etc - Gramsci. 25/6 09:03 (read 13074 times)
- The reference I made to extreme examples - bitterblue 25/6 09:18 (read 12965 times)
- Which aspects of the lockdown were too severe for you? Nt - Gramsci. 25/6 10:09 (read 13116 times)
- Quelle surprise! - bitterblue 25/6 10:47 (read 12874 times)
- I thought we were comparing our appetite for libertarianism. So - Gramsci. 25/6 11:29 (read 13077 times)
- You misunderstand my initial post, - bitterblue 25/6 12:54 (read 12857 times)
- would it be unfair to say... - Nicolae 25/6 14:00 (read 13077 times)
- I don't think you're right there - Gramsci. 25/6 14:25 (read 13054 times)
- (hasty title edit) your post makes sense now ;-) - Nicolae 25/6 14:55 (read 12749 times)
- I don't think you're right there - Gramsci. 25/6 14:25 (read 13054 times)
- "a higher rather than lower level of governmental control over the individual citizen" = the libertarian continuum - Gramsci. 25/6 13:56 (read 12600 times)
- <tumbleweed> from bitterblue - Gramsci. 26/6 19:07 (read 12012 times)
- would it be unfair to say... - Nicolae 25/6 14:00 (read 13077 times)
- You misunderstand my initial post, - bitterblue 25/6 12:54 (read 12857 times)
- I thought we were comparing our appetite for libertarianism. So - Gramsci. 25/6 11:29 (read 13077 times)
- Quelle surprise! - bitterblue 25/6 10:47 (read 12874 times)
- Which aspects of the lockdown were too severe for you? Nt - Gramsci. 25/6 10:09 (read 13116 times)
- The reference I made to extreme examples - bitterblue 25/6 09:18 (read 12965 times)
- I am assuming that the Telegraph article you mentioned at the start is topical/about lockdown etc - Gramsci. 25/6 09:03 (read 13074 times)
- Hard cases make bad law, as the saying goes - bitterblue 25/6 08:36 (read 12709 times)
- And your view? The restrictions that we were under in April and May - Gramsci. 25/6 08:09 (read 12968 times)
- in the context of the article - bitterblue 25/6 07:28 (read 12654 times)
- What does "state control of the individual" mean? - Gramsci. 24/6 22:57 (read 12714 times)