2020 07:57Curious to know why a car company cutting £2.3bn in costs - Gramsci.

and shedding 2,800 jobs in Europe is so positive to you. Is it something like "f*** you forriners, we're doing Brexit and we're the ones keeping the jobs" or something?

The positive for Sunderland's workers that they are not (for now) affected by redunancies is clearly reported.

So, net, a fairly negative set of FACTS reported fairly.

Unless there's something I am missing here, which is entirely possible.

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

Fair play to the Guardian - Nicolae 28/5 19:49 (read 8866 times, 12 posts in thread)
- 2,800 people losing their jobs is a positive story? - Robin Ho 31/5 14:39 (read 8058 times)
- Curious to know why a car company cutting £2.3bn in costs - Gramsci. 29/5 07:57 (read 8163 times)
  - Any lost job that isn't British - arty_fufkin 29/5 10:07 (read 8257 times)
    - Confirmation of British exceptionalism. Arf! Yeah that must be it - Nicolae 29/5 10:17 (read 8382 times)
      - Re: "efficiency savings" - Snout 29/5 22:40 (read 8723 times)
        
        Re: "efficiency savings" - Nicolae 29/5 23:29 (read 8398 times)
  - Curious to know why a car company securing 7000 British jobs is not a positive to you - Nicolae 29/5 10:06 (read 8380 times)
    - Re: Curious to know why a car company securing 7000 British jobs is not a positive to you - xosta 12/6 10:01 (read 4000 times)
    - The story was of cuts whch aren't (yet) hitting Sunderland - Gramsci. 29/5 10:57 (read 8353 times)
      - So, essentially, Nissan Sunderland are being subsidised by the UK taxpayer - Gramsci. 29/5 11:27 (read 8250 times)
        
        ./,/ - Nicolae 29/5 11:45 (read 7866 times)

posted on 29/5/2020 07:57Curious to know why a car company cutting £2.3bn in costs - Gramsci.

Report Abuse